Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 20:00:31 +0930 From: "Paul A. Hoadley" <paulh@logicsquad.net> To: Cory Petkovsek <cory@adaptableit.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GPL: implications for FreeBSD-on-hardware for sale? Message-ID: <20040410103031.GB92584@grover.logicsquad.net> In-Reply-To: <20040410085523.GE10773@adaptableit.com> References: <20040410074515.GS85168@grover.logicsquad.net> <20040410085523.GE10773@adaptableit.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--XF85m9dhOBO43t/C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 01:55:23AM -0700, Cory Petkovsek wrote: > Your own proprietary binaries you can distribute along side the GPL > and BSD code, provided you don't have GPL code within your programs. > It can all be bundled together as long as you have licensing, > copyrights and required source as part of the package (or possibly > available, but not part of the package). Thanks for that. Again, then, I think I was interpreting the text of the license too restrictively---obviously my own code does not become a derivative work just because it's sitting on the same disk. (Not sure why I thought it would.) Thanks for the input, Cory. --=20 Paul. mailto:paulh@logicsquad.net --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAd8zH730Z/jysbzIRAp1fAJ96iOpRa3RJae/7qVa2Kc961y/6aACfVeTO 7y5slbo/BZX6QfwDadaw3Y8= =5q5h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040410103031.GB92584>