Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 17:51:24 -0700 From: Roop Nanuwa <roop.nanuwa@gmail.com> To: Christopher Nehren <apeiron@comcast.net> Cc: FreeBSD Questions List <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: the most light weight X web browser? Message-ID: <75f3f705040508175120dc669f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20040508203555.GA862@prophecy.dyndns.org> References: <20040508203555.GA862@prophecy.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 8 May 2004 16:35:55 -0400, Christopher Nehren <apeiron@comcast.net> wrote: > > ... right. Opera is a kitchen sink suite just like Mozilla. > That, and it's the ugliest thing on the planet -- even worse than > anything Apple's ever released, IMO. > It is feature-packed, that's true. However, feature-packed and slow/bloated are not necessarily synonymous. It is blazing fast and low on requirements - what difference does it make if it has extraneous features? Those features aren't hampering anything one wants to accomplish if they don't make use of them. As for looks, Opera is skinable. If you don't like the look, there's nothing stopping you from choosing from hundreds of different skins. --roop
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?75f3f705040508175120dc669f>