Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 09:31:44 +0200 From: Emil Isberg <freebsd@pyttemjuk.se> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: external todo patch to qmail (ports) Message-ID: <6.1.2.0.2.20040907092825.03f35ec0@imap.pyttemjuk.se> In-Reply-To: <20040906133239.2c42ffb7.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <6.1.2.0.2.20040906171837.03ff8170@imap.pyttemjuk.se> <20040906133239.2c42ffb7.wmoran@potentialtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 19:32 2004-09-06, you wrote: >Emil Isberg <freebsd@pyttemjuk.se> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I sent the following message to the qmail port maintainer. > > External todo patch is a good option to have for busy mailservers since if > > you continously get email to your smtp-server then qmail-send can't > keep up > > with both todo-queue and spawning qmail-local/qmail-remote. > > > > I don't suggest changing the default install, but only add external > todo as > > an option for those of us that use freebsd and qmail for busy mailservers. > > > > I have not yet received any response from the qmail port maintainer so I > > wonder where I should go and whom I should turn to to get it included in > > the port or a reason why it shouldn't be added. > >Have you filed a PR? >http://www.freebsd.org/send-pr.html No I didn't. When I was going to the text said that to be sure that I really should file a PR (since it wasn't a bug) then I should ask on freebsd-questions. :-) I'll file a PR then. Thanks.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.1.2.0.2.20040907092825.03f35ec0>