Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 16:43:18 +0200 From: Matthias Schuendehuette <msch@snafu.de> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IRQ-Routing for 5.3-BETA Message-ID: <200409251643.19401.msch@snafu.de> In-Reply-To: <200409241514.53704.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <200409232235.08683.msch@snafu.de> <200409241514.53704.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi John, On Friday 24 September 2004 21:14, John Baldwin wrote: > Umm the list of IRQ numbers is the list of valid IRQs. Your BIOS is > _ineded_ buggy. Note that for the IRQ in question it says this: > > > \_SB_.PCI0.LNKA irq 9: [ 1 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 14 15] > low,level,sharable 0.1.0 > > I.e., I'm using IRQ 9, but 9 is not in the list of valid IRQs which > includes 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 14, and 15. Thus, the kernel > believes what your broken BIOS says and throws out IRQ 9 and tries to > use IRQ 10 instead, which your BIOS claims is open for use even > though you've told it its not. One thing you can try is a patch Nate > has to always treat ACPI's interrupt (IRQ 9 usually) as a valid > interrupt for the link device to use. Umm... this seems to be completely logic. I reconfigured my ISDN-Card to use IRQ2/9 (which was more simple than I remembered :-) and it works! Shame on me, sometimes it's really too simple... Thank you for the hint and your patience with a "would-like-to-be-a-unix-admin" getting older... :-/ -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette <msch [at] snafu.de>, Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at <pgp.mit.edu> and <wwwkeys.de.pgp.net> ID: 0xDDFB0A5F
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200409251643.19401.msch>