Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:47:53 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: EHCI considered harmful? Message-ID: <6.1.2.0.0.20041029134511.04ff09a8@64.7.153.2> In-Reply-To: <200410291930.30626.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <20041029075930.GG701@marvin.riggiland.au> <200410291511.24063.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <6.1.2.0.0.20041029114847.0aa57728@64.7.153.2> <200410291930.30626.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 01:30 PM 29/10/2004, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> > On my Intel 865 box, its pretty easy for me to lock the system up with 2
> > different types of USB key drives (Lexar and SANDISK). The system also
> > sporadically locks up at boot time, if I have a Keyspan USB-Serial device
> > plugged in using EHCI. For new users, I think its more important that the
> > system works.
>
>There are similar issues all over USB in FreeBSD, that's not a good rationale
>to leave ehci out of GENERIC.
With the base USB ? Regular USB works just fine for me on the same
hardware. Can you quantify what you mean by similar ? If I had to take a
guess by whats reported in -current, -stable and -questions, I would have
thought there are 1/10th the problems.
---Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.1.2.0.0.20041029134511.04ff09a8>