Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 05:49:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com> To: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl> Cc: Niklas Sorensson <nik@cs.chalmers.se> Subject: Re: Debug options Message-ID: <20050425053736.K23468@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> In-Reply-To: <20050425081927.GA56859@stack.nl> References: <52997.83.226.116.53.1114121015.squirrel@webmail.chalmers.se> <20050423024259.B68772@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <20050425081927.GA56859@stack.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Marc Olzheim wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 02:44:53AM -0400, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: >> May I also suggest tuning(7)? > > As in: may you suggest someone put this in tuning(7) ? Just from the fact that the document refers to 4.5 in the loader tunables section, it might be time to revamp it with information that is relevant to the current state of affairs, yes. > Or what part of tuning(7) are you referring to ? The original question was: "Are there any other options that affect performance? The note mentions malloc-debugging flags, but I don't know how to turn it off." Tuning has good information on sysctls which directly affect networking and vm performance. Despite its age, this document is a good read for anyone that is trying to get cheap performance. > No use pointing to manpages if the info isn't there. :-/ Naturally. :-) Cheers, Andy | Andre Guibert de Bruet | Enterprise Software Consultant > | Silicon Landmark, LLC. | http://siliconlandmark.com/ >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050425053736.K23468>