Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 14:26:42 +0000 (GMT) From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk> To: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnome-upgrade.sh Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.62.0511111425250.19268@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <200511110603.44395.ringworm01@gmail.com> References: <43726E40.3090701@iaces.com> <Pine.GSO.4.62.0511111357190.19268@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk> <200511110558.26310.ringworm01@gmail.com> <200511110603.44395.ringworm01@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > On Friday 11 November 2005 05:58, Jan Grant wrote: > > > On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > > > > [on wildcards in portmanager rules] > > > > > > > Silly me, I get it now. Not supported yet but I like the idea so am > > > > adding it to the things to do list. This one will be near the top. > > > > > > That's great! - especially since that pretty much makes it a mechanical > > > process to take pkgtools.conf and spit out a corresponding portmanager > > > config. > > > > > > Thanks Mike. > > > > I'll try to remember cc'ing you when I submit a change this. My guess is > > two days to a week, depends on if any new bugs are reported. > > > > -Mike > > One last thing, if you make a script that does the conversion, might I have a > copy? Here is how I'll set up pm-020.conf to work: Surely. pkgtools.conf is actually a ruby script: I've no idea how dynamically the rules are evaluated but something that works ona prettystock bunch of settings should be close to trivial. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44 (0)117 3317661 http://ioctl.org/jan/ ...and then three milkmaids turned up (to the delight and delactation of the crowd).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.62.0511111425250.19268>