Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:24:53 +0200
From:      Niki Denev <nike_d@cytexbg.com>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: filesystem snapshot timestamp not correct?
Message-ID:  <200602281124.54390.nike_d@cytexbg.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060228085931.GB44851@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <200602281040.36507.nike_d@cytexbg.com> <200602281055.34762.nike_d@cytexbg.com> <20060228085931.GB44851@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 10:59, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 10:55:34AM +0200, Niki Denev wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 February 2006 10:48, you wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:40:36 +0200,
> > >
> > >  Niki Denev <nike_d@cytexbg.com> wrote:
> > > > Any ideas? Probably i'm doing something wrong, but can't see it
> > > > yet...
> > >
> > > Tri it.
> > >
> > > DIR=/.snap
> > > nice sh -c "cd $DIR ; rm -rf `date -v-7d +'snapshot-%d-%m-%y'`"
> > > ----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+
> > >  NAKAMURA Takeshi <1yen@sh.rim.or.jp>
> > >  I have poor english.
> >
> > Thanks, this will work... but i was under the impression that
> > the snapshots will have meaningful timestamps too.
> > At least this is what is mentioned in
> > /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/README.snapshot :
> >
> >   2) Run dump on the snapshot. You will get a dump that is
> >      consistent with the filesystem as of the timestamp of the
> >      snapshot.
>
> It means "as of the time the snapshot was made".
>
> Kris

I see, thanks :)
So then is there any meaningful value of the timestamps i
get with 'ls'?

Niki

Niki





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200602281124.54390.nike_d>