Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:41:23 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: vkashyap@freebsd.org, gibbs@freebsd.org, nork@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com Subject: Re: aha(4) doesn't depend on cam(4). Message-ID: <44237873.7020102@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <20060323.104913.122061815.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20060324011416.acd8df42.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20060324013616.1b6f66ac.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20060324014047.95ffc1e3.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20060323.104913.122061815.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20060324014047.95ffc1e3.nork@FreeBSD.org> > Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org> writes: > : Hi aha(4) maintainers! > : > : I have a patch for aha(4). > > Actually, I'm the aha maintainer. > > Why is this needed? Is it because aha references symbols that would > otherwise be undefined? > > Warner > I think what he wants is to have cam.ko load when aha.ko is loaded (I'm taking a leap here in that I haven't checked to see if aha.ko exists). It's a harmless patch anyways, not sure why there needs to be an argument about it. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44237873.7020102>