Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 17:24:10 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD 6] semctl broken compared to 4-STABLE ... Message-ID: <20060402172021.B947@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20060402195657.GA57843@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060402144704.S947@ganymede.hub.org> <20060402191519.GA56599@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060402162612.N947@ganymede.hub.org> <20060402193808.GA57127@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060402165234.Y947@ganymede.hub.org> <20060402195657.GA57843@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Right, but why are they doing it *consistently* in FreeBSD 6.x, when they >> never did it in FreeBSD 4.x? I have postmaster processes running on the >> FreeBSD box as far back as November 27th, 2005 ... and have *never* >> experienced this problem ... so it isn't PostgreSQL that has changed, >> something in FreeBSD has changed :( > > You'll need to do some debugging to find out which of the two causes > of EINVAL are true here (or some undocumented cause). 'k, right now, the checks in PostgreSQL are just seeing if the result of semctl < 0 ... i see from the man page what 'two values' of EINVAL you are referring to ... but, if they both return the same ERRNO, how do I determine which of the two is the cause of the problem? :( ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060402172021.B947>