Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 17:05:07 +0800 From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> To: Rostislav Krasny <rosti.bsd@gmail.com> Cc: is@rambler-co.ru, cperciva@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-SA-06:14.fpu Message-ID: <200605191705.07309.davidxu@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060519041052.ab8dbbe9.rosti.bsd@gmail.com> References: <20060430142408.fcd60069.rosti.bsd@gmail.com> <200605190802.08825.davidxu@freebsd.org> <20060519041052.ab8dbbe9.rosti.bsd@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 19 May 2006 09:10, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > Ok. What should I do before adding the above #ifdef's? Is it enough to > change following files only? > > src/sys/conf/options I think they are sys/conf/options.i386 and sys/conf/options.amd64 > src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC > src/sys/i386/conf/NOTES > src/sys/i386/conf/PAE > src/sys/i386/conf/SMP > src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC > src/sys/amd64/conf/NOTES > src/sys/amd64/conf/SMP > I think modifying GENERIC and NOTES is enough. > > but I would call it BUG_FXSAVE like Linux's select() > > changed timeout value which only added incompatibility rather than > > advantage. > > I don't know about Linux's select() but according to what I've seen on > their "7466f9e72dac13452d871a3fb72fc7bd9c93c864" commit they use > X86_FEATURE_FXSAVE_LEAK. What do you think about FXSAVE_LEAK instead of > BUG_FXSAVE? I have no objection. David Xu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200605191705.07309.davidxu>