Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:38:13 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Marko Zec <zec@icir.org>, Brett Glass <brett@lariat.net> Subject: Re: Multiple NAT router Message-ID: <44C67325.8040504@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20060725073436.GA7477@uk.tiscali.com> References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060721105813.0971ae90@lariat.net> <20060724090909.GB3412@uk.tiscali.com> <200607241609.30783.zec@icir.org> <20060724192419.GA5474@uk.tiscali.com> <44C5302D.1020807@elischer.org> <20060725073436.GA7477@uk.tiscali.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian Candler wrote: >On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 01:40:13PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > >>an ng_ip node :-) >>I've considerred it. >> >> > >Then all the tools like 'netstat' and 'route' need modifying to talk to a >netgraph socket, but in principle I don't see why it couldn't be done. > >ISTM there are a zillion userland-to-kernel and kernel-to-kernel >communication interfaces: >- ioctl >- geom >- cam >- netgraph >- vfs >- sysctl >- kmem >- procfs >- ... > >Perhaps they could all be replaced by netgraph?? > > no, netgraph's interface is very specialised in its characteristics. though you could replace tun, tap and gif very easily. >Regards, > >Brian. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44C67325.8040504>