Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 02:56:25 +0000 From: John Birrell <jb@what-creek.com> To: Kip Macy <kmacy@fsmware.com> Cc: John Birrell <jb@freebsd.org>, Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 103141 for review Message-ID: <20060804025625.GA63836@what-creek.com> In-Reply-To: <20060803191858.C53360@demos.bsdclusters.com> References: <200608032139.k73LdViR080818@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060803191858.C53360@demos.bsdclusters.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 07:20:02PM -0700, Kip Macy wrote: > Hey - you were the one who said it wasn't ready! Yeah. So sue me! There have been too many rug-changing-under-foot things lately. > As you know, KSE needs to be optional at compile-time first. Work-in-progress! I've added the kse syscalls back into the dtrace tree and also kern_kse.c with a kernel option 'KSE' that will stub out the kse syscalls if KSE isn't defined. I need to go though the rest of the kernel sources and #ifdef KSE to get kse support back in and bike_sched otherwise. -- John Birrell
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060804025625.GA63836>