Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:25:02 -0400 From: John Baldwin <john@baldwin.cx> To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org, John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: anders@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/103127: Kernel panic while using thread features in Squid 2.6 Message-ID: <200609221425.02723.john@baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <20060922023748.GR23915@funkthat.com> References: <200609202105.k8KL5fh7081141@freefall.freebsd.org> <200609212152.31366.john@baldwin.cx> <20060922023748.GR23915@funkthat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 21 September 2006 22:37, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > John Baldwin wrote this message on Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 21:52 -0400: > > On Wednesday 20 September 2006 17:05, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > > Synopsis: Kernel panic while using thread features in Squid 2.6 > > > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > > > State-Changed-By: jmg > > > State-Changed-When: Wed Sep 20 21:04:55 UTC 2006 > > > State-Changed-Why: > > > waiting for people to test the patch of badfo_kqfilter that is attached > > > to the bug.. > > > > Should it possibly return EBADF rather than EINVAL? > > If we got this far, we have to have a valid fd, maybe ENXIO? badfo_* are used for bad (invalid) file descriptors. :) All the other badfo_* functions return EBADF (except for poll, since it returns an event mask rather than an errno). -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200609221425.02723.john>