Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:55:50 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems Message-ID: <20070225235550.GA80623@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20070226002323.V18301@godot.imp.ch> References: <20070224213111.GB41434@xor.obsecurity.org> <346a80220702242100i7ec22b5h4b25cc7d20d03e98@mail.gmail.com> <20070225054120.GA47059@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070225104709.S36322@fledge.watson.org> <20070225134508.C18301@godot.imp.ch> <20070225193128.GC77205@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070226002323.V18301@godot.imp.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 12:27:01AM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > >If you can package up some kind of test or analogous workload that I > >can run, I'd be happy to take a look at profiling it on MP hardware. > > >=20 > Should be possible. Btw. Has setting kern.threads.virtual_cpu to a differ= ent > value effect for running programms or just started ones ? Dunno what that does, sorry. > >P.S. I assume you've done all the usual things like using libthr > >instead of libpthread. >=20 > Yes, all clamd installations we have run with libthr, since libptread is > completly unusable and libc_r has small hangs from time to time. The > question is just if this is a clamd problem or an threading library > problem. OK Kris --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFF4iIFWry0BWjoQKURAv2oAJ9hYHPRrG/JTgT+IRElOtn+oNvnTQCg+jZ0 HPGrG4YYUm5km6FB9olEloQ= =rkOP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070225235550.GA80623>