Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 21:19:55 +0100 From: Paolo Pisati <piso@freebsd.org> To: "HM Eng.Prowip" <eng@prowip.net.br> Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, Paolo Pisati <piso@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf NOTES files src/sys/modules/ipfw_nat Makefile src/sys/netinet ip_fw.h ip_fw2.c ip_fw_nat.c Message-ID: <20080309201955.GA51679@tin.it> In-Reply-To: <200803091416.45296.eng@prowip.net.br> References: <200802292227.m1TMRJwb013420@repoman.freebsd.org> <200803091416.45296.eng@prowip.net.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 02:16:45PM -0300, HM Eng.Prowip wrote: > > Move ipfw's nat code into its own kld: ipfw_nat. > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.1469 +1 -2 src/sys/conf/NOTES > > 1.1272 +1 -0 src/sys/conf/files > > 1.1 +8 -0 src/sys/modules/ipfw_nat/Makefile (new) > > 1.112 +32 -0 src/sys/netinet/ip_fw.h > > 1.182 +54 -552 src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c > > 1.1 +646 -0 src/sys/netinet/ip_fw_nat.c (new) > > _______________________________________________ > > > > since this update I get constant > > Mar 9 14:06:27 gw kernel: ipfw: install_state: entry already present, done > Mar 9 14:06:30 gw kernel: ipfw: install_state: entry already present, done > > in my log > I do not use nat > > what does this mean? uhm... i dont' see how this could happen: ip_fw2::install_state() q = lookup_dyn_rule_locked(&args->f_id, NULL, NULL); if (q != NULL) { /* should never occur */ if (last_log != time_uptime) { last_log = time_uptime; printf("ipfw: %s: entry already present, done\n", __func__); } IPFW_DYN_UNLOCK(); return (0); } show me your ipfw ruleset/kernel config and i'll try to reproduce it. Is it possible to have access to that box? -- bye, P.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080309201955.GA51679>