Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 23:19:31 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Interrupt storm with shared interrupt on digi(4) Message-ID: <20080605061931.GF48790@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <200806041044.01712.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <20080603070840.GH1028@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <200806031021.35416.jhb@freebsd.org> <20080603190418.GP1028@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <200806041044.01712.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> [080604 11:12] wrote: > On Tuesday 03 June 2008 03:04:18 pm Peter Jeremy wrote: > > BTW, your MUA's list-reply configuration don't recognize that > > freebsd-stable@ and stable@ are aliases. > > Yes, kmail is broken and the authors refuse to fix it. It happens on reply to > a foo@ e-mail (it changes the 'To' to 'freebsd-foo@' because of the List-Id > header and leaves foo@ in the 'CC' field). Note that there isn't anything in > the List headers that says that foo@ is an alias for freebsd-foo@. I just > wish I could turn off the List-Id crap and use plain old reply-to-all, but > that is where the kmail developers disagree. wtf.....why not just have a checkbox to toggle the behavior? -- - Alfred Perlstein
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080605061931.GF48790>