Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:49:00 +0200 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> To: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lack of Flash support is no longer acceptable. Bounty established... Message-ID: <20080621134900.GA23957@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20080620200950.GA67295@cons.org> References: <20080619135114.Y1807@kozubik.com> <20080620083906.71332251xw1ckmu8@webmail.leidinger.net> <1213972236.1505.14.camel@scotth.emsphone.com> <20080620104459.1393510x2w93m6ck@intranet.encontacto.net> <20080620200950.GA67295@cons.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 04:09:50PM -0400, Martin Cracauer wrote: > Is it crashing right at startup? What happens if you create a minimal > (aka empty) Flash thingy on a website? Does it go through the startup, > is there any Flash element that doesn't crash on FreeBSD? > > How long is the syscall trace in that minimal case? Small enough to > diff out (after awk) against a Linux strace? iirc it crashes quite early when attempting to play a video on youtube. back then when I tried to debug this my ktrace output was ~2 milion lines if I am not mistaken. I am not sure if you can find what the problem is by comparing syscall traces... the problem is probably with implementation of some syscall or something like that so checking arguments to syscalls wont help. I hope you will prove me wrong :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080621134900.GA23957>