Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 19:03:51 +0100 From: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Google Chrome Message-ID: <20080903190351.389b5259@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20080903143901.GA32027@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <da7069940809021338s686fc5a0pbf226363ec8f6427@mail.gmail.com> <57057966651240527470195062000340979511-Webmail2@me.com> <26682.8228872784$1220442858@news.gmane.org> <g9ltvn$m0m$1@ger.gmane.org> <20080903135750.F2188@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080903151335.0454e929@gumby.homeunix.com.> <20080903143901.GA32027@Grumpy.DynDNS.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:39:01 -0500 David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 03:13:35PM +0100, RW wrote: > > > > For most people that's already happened, except that it's > > Adobe-Flash WWW. Google's approach of open-source software, and > > open-extensions, leading to new standards, sounds a lot better to > > me. > > What about this? > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/03/google_chrome_eula_sucks/ That's for the binary. AFAIK the source is BSD licensed, with some third-party components under other open-source licences.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080903190351.389b5259>