Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:50:37 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Geoff Fritz <gfritz@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cooking LLVM in FreeBSD 8 Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903171847210.58509@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20090317155123.GA6295@dev.null> References: <CF72636E-0A45-4970-BAF0-FDD53C8456B7@yahoo.fr> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903171347550.57834@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090317140221.GA85698@dev.null> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0903171518220.58104@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090317155123.GA6295@dev.null>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> master FreeBSD sources. > > Please don't read too much into my remark, as I don't like to engage in > license ideology debates. I like GPL, BSD, and all the zillions of other i do use GPL programs too without any problems - because there is no BSD licenced equivalent (most often), or BSD licenced equivalent is much weaker (rare cases). but it doesn't change what i said. GPL licence is unacceptable if you want to make any commercial product based on code licenced that way. FREEDOM CAN NOT BE ENFORCED. > open source variants. In my pre-coffee mental haze this morning, I didn't > phrase it in such a way to denote that it was mostly a toungue-in-cheek > comment about the motivation to replace the venerable gcc from the base > system (which, for technical reasons, I personally feel to be a worthy > goal). > > -- Geoff > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0903171847210.58509>