Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:57:55 +0000 From: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, uspoerlein@gmail.com Subject: Re: gemor mirror and priority Message-ID: <E1LlP7b-000OqQ-CW@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> In-Reply-To: <20090322090740.GA1519@roadrunner.spoerlein.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I did this for 2-3 years and it has worked very well. Of course I took > care of using the right priorities from the start. This setup has now > been replaced by a ZFS mirror. The resilver time is just so much better :) How do you find ZFS performance in an asymetric mirror, and does it seem to cope OK if the remote disc fails ? One of the reaons I have stuck with gmirror is that it seems extremely tolerant to having one of the drives vanish from underneath it (as sometimes happens with a remote disc). When I experimented doing this with ZFS I found that it did not work well at all (lock ups until the disc I had taken away came back). -pete.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1LlP7b-000OqQ-CW>