Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 01:13:02 +0200 From: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> To: Chris Cowart <ccowart@rescomp.berkeley.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is this a gmirror bug? Message-ID: <20090527011302.98954329.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20090526230522.GH49013@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> References: <B8A480488C0C6849826655761349EA4338D4@owa.webmail.maxiscale.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905262333080.48107@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20090526230522.GH49013@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 26 May 2009 16:05:22 -0700, Chris Cowart <ccowart@rescomp.berkeley.edu> wrote: > 10% of the disk space is reserved for the superuser. The 10% free > mark is what shows as 0% in df. If you're negative, it means you've > tapped into the super-user reserve. This is not good, because it means > you've lost a lot of the FS-level optimizations from UFS. Wouldn't it look like Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/mirror/gm0d 4058062 -377792 4111210 110% /tmp /dev/mirror/gm0e 15231278 -113942 14126718 101% /var then? I always assumed that a disk occupation > 100% would go into this reserved area, which would turn the Capacity field to be more than 100%, and not less than 0%? This is the case when I have more data on a UFS partition than it "is allowed to"... -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090527011302.98954329.freebsd>