Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:20:04 -0700
From:      Charlie Kester <corky1951@comcast.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: OT: C syntax question
Message-ID:  <20090630022004.GB72216@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <20090630021210.GA72216@comcast.net>
References:  <19017.24376.343126.389436@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20090629204828.02ee3cb8@mail.pchotshots.com> <20090630021210.GA72216@comcast.net>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On Mon 29 Jun 2009 at 19:12:10 PDT Charlie Kester wrote:
>
>Of course, it doesn't hurt to specify the number of elements in
>both dimensions.  But it would be a less general solution,  With
>only the minor dimension specified, plate_shift can take pointers
>to arrays of 20, 30, 40, 100 or 200 CONTINENT structures.  Any

Oops.  That's not worded correctly.  It should be:

... plate_shift can take a pointer to a multidimensional array of
20,30,40, 100 or 200 CONTINENT structures.

(Don't you hate it when your mistakes come back to haunt you in your
inbox?)


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090630022004.GB72216>