Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:20:04 -0700 From: Charlie Kester <corky1951@comcast.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: C syntax question Message-ID: <20090630022004.GB72216@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <20090630021210.GA72216@comcast.net> References: <19017.24376.343126.389436@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20090629204828.02ee3cb8@mail.pchotshots.com> <20090630021210.GA72216@comcast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon 29 Jun 2009 at 19:12:10 PDT Charlie Kester wrote: > >Of course, it doesn't hurt to specify the number of elements in >both dimensions. But it would be a less general solution, With >only the minor dimension specified, plate_shift can take pointers >to arrays of 20, 30, 40, 100 or 200 CONTINENT structures. Any Oops. That's not worded correctly. It should be: ... plate_shift can take a pointer to a multidimensional array of 20,30,40, 100 or 200 CONTINENT structures. (Don't you hate it when your mistakes come back to haunt you in your inbox?)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090630022004.GB72216>