Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:20:41 +0200
From:      Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: NEWBUS states
Message-ID:  <3bbf2fe10909130820t62f03cfflcdf45a651db15f14@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090905.111446.500055027.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <3bbf2fe10909041546y2b5633e1ue063955568df1a06@mail.gmail.com> <20090904.172310.-1939841993.imp@bsdimp.com> <3bbf2fe10909050812l4340f679h6a4d7dae1daa3bf8@mail.gmail.com> <20090905.111446.500055027.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/9/5 M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>:
> Attilio,
>
> [[ trimmed ]]
>
> Sounds like we're getting closer to closure...
>

So I reverted r196779 and now I would like to commit and MFC just this patch:
http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/newbus9-8.diff

I still think the good way to go is to use the device flags, but this
patch will allow us to be highly flexible in terms of adding new
states, if we need it in the future.

Let me know if you have objections against that.

Attilio


-- 
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3bbf2fe10909130820t62f03cfflcdf45a651db15f14>