Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 22:33:52 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> To: Geraint Edwards <gedge@yadn.org> Cc: apache@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/apache20 versus devel/apr* Message-ID: <4BF315D0.2090708@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <20100518212944.GC51535@yadn.org> References: <20100518212944.GC51535@yadn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/18/10 21:29, Geraint Edwards wrote:
> Hi,
> It's right, that directory does not exist,
> www/apache20/Makefile seems to think it should exist:
>
> USE_LDCONFIG= ${PREFIX}/lib/apache2
>
> so, should that Makefile look like this next line instead
(.../libexec/... exists)?
>
> USE_LDCONFIG= ${PREFIX}/libexec/apache2
Yes, this is ancient though; however, its on my list.
> I *think* I just followed the UPDATING instructions for my www/apache20 installation:
>
> - pkg_delete'd www/apache20
> - ran the suggested portmaster command for devel/apr1 - it was already installed!
> - (re)installed www/apache20 which failed at the start with an apr* conflict
so devel/apr now devel/apr1 could have come from a variety of things
subversion,serf,kde-svn,.....
I guess we might want to delete apr too, but I'm not sure. The end
result is if you have APACHE_PORT=www/apache20 you going to be tied to
devel/apr0 in the end. There are about a billion combination to test
the upgrade path for and I'll never be able to catch them all.
The end meaning is
www/apache20 -> devel/apr0
www/apache22 -> devel/apr1
noting that www/apache20 before update conflicts with the new devel/apr0
and www/apache22 before update conflicts with the new devel/apr1
depending on flags.
> I had devel/apr1 installed (the result of the UPDATING instructions?),
> but that seems to be a more recent version than www/apache20 allowed.
Thats a good check b/c its too new.
>
> Did I misunderstand the UPDATING info?
I think you followed it right, but I'm unsure how to make it better just
yet.
> Okay, I uninstalled devel/apr1 and installed www/apache20 directly.
in your case, the portupgrade -f -o would have been devel/apr0 not
devel/apr1.
I can't tell you how unsupported httpd 2.0.x is upstream.
to quote an httpd dev other then me from less then 5 minutes ago.
22:15 < pquerna> 2.2 has only been out for I dunno
22:15 < pquerna> 6 years
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C
Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354
VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation
Committer, FreeBSD Foundation
Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc.
Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc.
Work like you don't need the money,
love like you'll never get hurt,
and dance like nobody's watching.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BF315D0.2090708>