Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:05:04 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 8.1-PRERELEASE: CPU packages not detected correctly Message-ID: <4C783690.2020101@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <201008271803.27295.jkim@FreeBSD.org> References: <201007141414.o6EEEUx9014690@lurza.secnetix.de> <201008271615.58056.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4C781DDB.1080903@icyb.net.ua> <201008271803.27295.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 28/08/2010 01:03 Jung-uk Kim said the following: > On Friday 27 August 2010 04:19 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> I still don't get your point. >> My point is that if the Intel's code gets the topology right, then >> the hardware is emulated properly and the problem is with the >> patch. >> What is your point? :) > > My point is "right" topology means nothing in this context if CPU > affinity of guest OS does not reflect hypervisor's point of view. I see. And I just cared about the pretty message in dmesg, nothing more :-) -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C783690.2020101>