Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:25:44 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Diane Bruce <db@db.net> Cc: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: log2(), log2f() and log2l() support in freebsd Message-ID: <20101016012544.GA82163@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20101016005017.GA56570@night.db.net> References: <20101016000605.GA21898@freebsd.org> <20101016005017.GA56570@night.db.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 08:50:17PM -0400, Diane Bruce wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:06:05AM +0000, Alexander Best wrote: > > hi there, > > > > could we please have support for log2(), log2f() and log2l() in freebsd? > > I have run into a similar problem. I already started with some complex > functions: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147599&cat= See my comment in the PR. Please, do not integrate the patch from that PR into FreeBSD without testing. Make sure your tests include complex numbers z = x + iy with combinations of x and y involving -inf, +inf, nan, +0, and -0. > Oh.. Ok, I have seen 82654. I believe my diff should take care of that one. > 83845 should be committed or the NetBSD code brought in. (Most current > version of fldigi needs log2.) Well, I wrote the patch in 82654. Having had sufficient interaction with bde and das, I have tried to withdraw the patch. It simply is not a robust patch. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101016012544.GA82163>