Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:15:46 +0300 From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= <kes-kes@yandex.ru> To: Larry Baird <lab@gta.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: Polling slows down bandwidth Message-ID: <1887153402.20101030201546@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <20101029181706.79027.qmail@mailgate.gta.com> References: <110929.14152.74663@localhost> <20101029181706.79027.qmail@mailgate.gta.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Larry.
LB> Also make sure kern.polling.idle_poll is enabled. By default it is
LB> disabled. This makes a big difference in polling throughput.
enabling that take all CPU time.
last pid: 38722; load averages: 1.88, 1.18, 0.85 up 1+18:43:28 20:04:54
101 processes: 5 running, 74 sleeping, 22 waiting
CPU: 1.4% user, 0.0% nice, 61.7% system, 36.8% interrupt, 0.0% idle
Mem: 395M Active, 898M Inact, 288M Wired, 5636K Cache, 213M Buf, 388M Free
Swap: 4063M Total, 4063M Free
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND
51 root 171 ki31 0K 16K RUN 0:56 39.89% idlepoll
14 root -44 - 0K 16K WAIT 3:50 30.47% swi1: net
2 root -68 - 0K 16K sleep 253:55 25.20% ng_queue0
17358 bind 44 0 223M 184M RUN 14:30 0.39% named
1324 root 44 0 31828K 9192K select 9:35 0.29% mpd5
55 root 20 - 0K 16K syncer 5:18 0.29% syncer
How that affect other processes? Will they be slowed down by idlepoll?
--
С уважением,
Коньков mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1887153402.20101030201546>