Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:22:08 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> To: Artem Belevich <fbsdlist@src.cx> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: syscall provider naming convention. Re: kern/152822: [patch] DTrace: syscall provider for compat/freebsd32 Message-ID: <4D061E00.7050606@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20101213103535.00005f3d@unknown> References: <AANLkTi=z1_KWKmhqFjNYHZfgAyPgsUVvgJ0P29KOPpnZ@mail.gmail.com> <20101211215341.0000097c@unknown> <AANLkTi=ehLNs8aeYfGUattetm7oMj8HhEB1Vnep9uAZk@mail.gmail.com> <20101213103535.00005f3d@unknown>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 13/12/2010 11:35 Alexander Leidinger said the following: > On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 23:38:32 -0800 Artem Belevich <fbsdlist@src.cx> > wrote: > >> Functionally both approaches are about the same functionally. Each has >> pluses and minuses. Using module, though, looks somewhat cleaner. > > I agree. +1, just in case. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D061E00.7050606>