Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 31 Jan 2011 17:50:29 +0200
From:      Zeus V Panchenko <zeus@ibs.dn.ua>
To:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Problem with re0
Message-ID:  <20110131155029.GF14888@relay.ibs.dn.ua>
In-Reply-To: <201101311630.03924.freebsd-net@dino.sk>
References:  <AANLkTinNydUwkyC9zb21P4DPbvBkEDKpNXbp3Nap%2BRvT@mail.gmail.com> <20110131011510.GC1323@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20110131020702.GA1229@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <201101311630.03924.freebsd-net@dino.sk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Milan Obuch (freebsd-net@dino.sk) [11.01.31 17:31] wrote:
> 
> I checked my cables and one of them had bad pairing. Worked in 100 Mb mode, 
> but not in 1 Gb mode. After I replaced it I check with flood ping, 1472 bytes 
> packets again and no sign of problem here - one reply missing in almost 21 
> millions tries. How are your flaps 'visible'? What fails? Ping test is simple, 
> so I could overlooked something, but now it works for in 1 Gb mode, too...
> 

while NIC flaps i see switch port on/off and in dmesg:
...
re0: link state changed to UP
re0: link state changed to DOWN
re0: link state changed to UP
re0: link state changed to DOWN
re0: link state changed to UP
re0: link state changed to DOWN
re0: link state changed to UP
re0: link state changed to DOWN
re0: link state changed to UP
re0: link state changed to DOWN
re0: link state changed to UP
...

-- 
Zeus V. Panchenko
IT Dpt., IBS ltd			      	        GMT+2 (EET)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110131155029.GF14888>