Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 11:21:48 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stable/8 nfsd: is it normal to have one worker regardless of -n setting? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1108011120250.66711@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20110801024830.GC59252@dan.emsphone.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1108010232241.66711@woozle.rinet.ru> <20110801024830.GC59252@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Aug 01), Dmitry Morozovsky said: > > just noticed that contemporary nfsd does not fork children in accordance > > to -n setting: > > > > stable/8: > > > > root@beaver:/usr/local/tb/scripts# pid nfs > > 1745 ?? Is 0:00.02 nfsd: master (nfsd) > > 1746 ?? S 0:03.29 nfsd: server (nfsd) > > root@beaver:/usr/local/tb/scripts# grep nfs_server_flags /etc/rc.conf > > nfs_server_flags="-u -t -n 4" > > They are threads now: > > # ps axw | grep nfsd > 1373 ?? Is 0:00.02 nfsd: master (nfsd) > 1374 ?? S 5:47.14 nfsd: server (nfsd) > # ps axwH | grep nfsd > 1373 ?? Is 0:00.02 nfsd: master (nfsd) > 1374 ?? S 1:25.79 nfsd: server (nfsd) > 1374 ?? S 1:26.65 nfsd: server (nfsd) > 1374 ?? S 1:27.67 nfsd: server (nfsd) > 1374 ?? S 1:27.04 nfsd: server (nfsd) Ah, yeah, how dumb is me, heh. Thank you for the pointer, and sorry for the noise. -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1108011120250.66711>