Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:35:06 -0600 From: Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com> To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@freebsd.org> Cc: Wen Heping <wen@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk Message-ID: <CAGsORuA%2B30wQ0QedeW9KzrM8QAenR=sXfhU%2BiVF5GQVH_4FR3A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20111115233614.22d3984e@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <CAGsORuAz--GVpiEkgnYJccqCESx2CJ12peFDk_JetfFj6kQqGw@mail.gmail.com> <20111115233614.22d3984e@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Currently, 12. Plus 3 committed, 1 unsubmitted, 3~4 planning to port. The total existing addons are listed here: http://code.google.com/p/pure-lang/wiki/Addons I probably not going to port all of them, but this list is growing. On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:02:38 -0600 > Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The PR which updates all pure-* ports was passed to portmgr for a long > > time, since it seem that to put a > > > > .if defined(USE_PURE) > > .include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.pure.mk" > > .endif > > > > In bsd.port.mk may a be better choice. Though Pure is not as popular > > as some languages like PHP or Python, but it does and it will have > > more ports than like Go. To include bsd.pure.mk under Mk/ can lower 2 > > lines in ~20 ports (or I have to leave it under lang/pure's private > > directory). > > How many pure ports are there ATM? > > -- > IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" > "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" > FreeBSD committer -> itetcu@FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B > -- Zhihao Yuan, nickname lichray The best way to predict the future is to invent it. ___________________________________________________ 4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGsORuA%2B30wQ0QedeW9KzrM8QAenR=sXfhU%2BiVF5GQVH_4FR3A>