Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 10:23:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Albert Shih <Albert.Shih@obspm.fr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Oscar Hodgson <oscar.hodgson@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Anyone using freebsd ZFS for large storage servers? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206021021290.35474@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20120601162431.GA44290@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <CACxnZKM__Lt9LMabyUC_HOCg2zsMT=3bpqwVrGj16py1A=qffg@mail.gmail.com> <20120601052309.GA32942@pcjas.obspm.fr> <CACxnZKM=5QXu29qmEd3FWmpQMeM7MuOPN7a_VwrM=Q_M-4uMUg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206011812120.4297@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20120601162431.GA44290@pcjas.obspm.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> When I say fast that's mean I already do some benchmarks with iozone. And > do some graphs to see what the performance are. > > What I can say is it's go lot faster than H700+ 12 disk 600 15k/min. i asked if it is faster than properly made UFS/gmirror/gstripe mix on the same hardware. > > And I do those tests on FreeBSD with 12 disk, 24 disk, 36 disk and finaly > 48 disk. would be nice. > All I can say is ZFS go faster than 12 disk with H700 (and ext3) almost > every time. if you compare to ext3 then maybe it is faster. compare to UFS. >> can be controlled by settings in loader.conf. > > Yes, but I think that's not a good idea to buy a server with 4 Go and make > him manage 100To through ZFS.... as for file server i don't see a reason to buy more.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206021021290.35474>