Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 19:57:30 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Hill <chris@monochrome.org> To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?G=F6k=BAin_Akdeniz?= <goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com> Cc: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk>, Kurt Buff <kurt.buff@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Questions <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206051952510.59814@tripel.monochrome.org> In-Reply-To: <20120605230025.a1e39827.goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com> References: <CADy1Ce7MihpmMowc265%2BS_RKorMO3KEKsCgr=pdnjg2jzq-dYQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120605221250.9da6bd5c.goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com> <4FCE61D4.9070300@cran.org.uk> <20120605230025.a1e39827.goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, G?k?in Akdeniz wrote: > For the time being only ARM platform is restricted. True, but I would be astonished if this restriction were not expanded by MS in the future. Just my opinion, but I believe their ultimate goal is to add platforms until the "secure boot" restriction encompasses most or all desktop and server hardware. This would be over a period of years. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging </> ]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206051952510.59814>