Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 18:27:42 +1000 From: Da Rock <freebsd-net@herveybayaustralia.com.au> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wpa_supplicant wpa peap gtc connection - gtc failing? Message-ID: <5031F4FE.50004@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <201208181923.04151.bschmidt@techwires.net> References: <502DA0F6.5040305@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <CAJ-Vmonb2n6Wn9017EvrA=s%2B%2B4_imQT6fvj3swy57dJEFbfKFQ@mail.gmail.com> <502F80D1.6040901@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <201208181923.04151.bschmidt@techwires.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/19/12 03:23, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > On Saturday 18 August 2012 13:47:29 Da Rock wrote: >> On 08/18/12 13:32, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>> Is there any reason we don't build with that option? >> You know, I was wondering that myself but I wasn't exactly sure whether >> to ask or not :) > Historical reasons I guess, our config matches the default > wpa_supplicant config. I don't see any technical reason not to > enable that and bunch of other exotic stuff. > > Though, as you've already noticed, one can count the number of > user who benefit from such a change on one hand.. ;) > Not sure it's worth the effort, though, if someone wants to do > the work, fine with me. > True on that one :) But then again, there are not many as tenacious as I am, and it is not clear that it has not been enabled anywhere. If the build is not worth it, perhaps some documentation to point a user to what can be added to the build? At least that way if someone is intent enough to find the info they can do something about it? Such as myself; if I had of known it needed the option it might have saved me several weeks of messing around. Just a note in the man pages might do, as well as a wiki, or the handbook. Cheers
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5031F4FE.50004>