Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:48:19 -0700 From: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> To: Patrick Lamaiziere <patfbsd@davenulle.org> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why RELENG_9 branch is labeled as PRERELEASE and freebsd.org says FreeBSD is currently at 9.1-RC2 ? Message-ID: <508D7DF3.8080103@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <20121028151758.5f866bcb@davenulle.org> References: <508C7445.6080809@rawbw.com> <20121028151758.5f866bcb@davenulle.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/28/2012 07:17, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > RELENG_9 should be called 9-STABLE, if you want 9.1 use RELENG_9_1 Hm, if they wanted to keep RELENG_9 as "stable" 9.X branch, why then 9.1-PRERELEASE is there? Is PRERELEASE considered more stable than RC? This looks strange to me. Yuri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?508D7DF3.8080103>