Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:41:21 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> To: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: revising sys/conf/files* dependencies Message-ID: <20130306084121.GA85685@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <20130306083420.GJ955@alchemy.franken.de> References: <20130305083817.GD13187@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <112844CF-69C3-49A3-8581-8EF2A7DA8E8A@bsdimp.com> <20130305211953.GA51357@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <6A93AA58-713D-4C25-A512-6927E27C5DE1@bsdimp.com> <20130306010720.GA68018@alchemy.franken.de> <20130306061119.GA77841@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20130306083420.GJ955@alchemy.franken.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:34:21AM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:11:19AM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 02:07:20AM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: ... > > Marius, just to clarify: > > > > sys/conf/files has no reasonable way to express dependencies. > > Correct, as Warner already said, but what you propose isn't an > acceptable workaround. it wasn't my intention to propose a workaround, i only preferred a more useful (in my opinion) failure mode. But given that there is little feedback and no agreement i'll take back my proposal. thanks for the comments luigihome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130306084121.GA85685>