Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 11:11:07 +0000 From: Pete French <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk> To: petefrench@ingresso.co.uk, trociny@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, to.my.trociny@gmail.com Subject: Re: Hast locking up under 9.2 Message-ID: <E1VlGXr-000J7k-H7@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20131125212706.GA6870@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It looks you were using the first version of my patch. This was false > positive: memsyncack may be false here if the request to the secondary > failed, e.g. due to disconnect. I fixed this later but forgot to > mention. Please use the latest patch: Actually, that assertions was from the unpatched code - I should have made that clear. > http://people.freebsd.org/~trociny/patches/hast.primary.c.memsync_write_complete.2.patch Will try and give this a test today. My hast stuff is getting a bit more complex due to the fact I;ve out one of them back into production with fullsync enabled as I have verified it works like that. WIll try this on the other drive later today though. -pete. ,
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1VlGXr-000J7k-H7>