Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 03:16:22 +0200 From: Reko Turja <reko.turja@liukuma.net> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin <baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com> Subject: Re: reason 23 why we've moved to linux Message-ID: <ab7d039a39fe09c8b9e50003aa51432f@liukuma.net> In-Reply-To: <20140324004645.GD91792@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <m2iorb1ms8.wl%randy@psg.com> <532EDDD0.80700@ohlste.in> <m2eh1spns4.wl%randy@psg.com> <CCD9FE91966E4B779886CB8053C809FA@Rivendell> <20140324004645.GD91792@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Baptiste Daroussin kirjoitti 24.3.2014 02:46: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 01:00:17AM +0200, Reko Turja wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> Of course, there are warts, snags and bumps now and then, but based on >> what >> I've seen, I like where the project is heading. Unless in the future >> the >> only way to build ports is using Poudriere + Sun/Oracle "How to get >> the >> suck... errr, customer invest into tons of our very costly special >> memory" >> filesystem. > > poudriere works perfectly without zfs ;) Poudriere wasn't always that way right? Or then I managed to misread the documentation at some point when pkgng first arrived for more public testing:) Anyways, that's good to know for the future, thanks! Another "me like" moment recently was when I upgraded some root dependency of SpamAssassin, just after the move, and portupgrade -rf handled the path change and port update without user intervention. That is a huge step in right direction IMO. Big thanks for all the parties who strive to make ports & packages better! -Reko
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ab7d039a39fe09c8b9e50003aa51432f>