Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 09:20:16 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Chagin Dmitry <dchagin@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, svn-src-user@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r265187 - in user/dchagin/lemul/sys: amd64/linux amd64/linux32 compat/linux i386/linux Message-ID: <201405020920.16637.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20140502044119.GA1354@dchagin.static.corbina.net> References: <201405011402.s41E2lnv074130@svn.freebsd.org> <844C08D2-4660-456A-9DCE-62A47A411688@bsdimp.com> <20140502044119.GA1354@dchagin.static.corbina.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, May 02, 2014 12:41:19 am Chagin Dmitry wrote: > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:13:09PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > On May 1, 2014, at 10:26 AM, Chagin Dmitry <dchagin@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:17:45AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > >> Re this and the signals changes: Are you sure that these values are identical on all linux ABIs? Last time I checked, there was substantial variation between arm, x86 and mips for these values. > > >> > > > > > > They are all different. I know. We emulate only x86, not arm or mips. So what the reason to case about this platform? > > > > The structure of the code is such that the other platforms can be added later. These changes make that harder than necessary when you could have move them to sys/x86 instead of making them fully MI. > > > > Anyway, just my humble feedback. I suspect we'll get demand to support linux/arm64 binaries about this time next year based on the trajectories of the arm64 roll out... > > > > yes, I ponder about something like sys/compat/linux/x86linux.h, thanks. I think I would prefer sys/x86/linux to mirror sys/amd64/linux32 and sys/i386/linux. You could put headers and/or .c files in that directory. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201405020920.16637.jhb>