Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 20:46:19 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org, Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Subject: Re: DRAM Rowhammer exploits Message-ID: <70815.1425933979@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <20150309202308.64DFBB82A@mail.bitblocks.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1503092248580.38285@woozle.rinet.ru> <91440.1425930724@critter.freebsd.dk> <20150309202308.64DFBB82A@mail.bitblocks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- In message <20150309202308.64DFBB82A@mail.bitblocks.com>, Bakul Shah writes: >On Mon, 09 Mar 2015 19:52:04 -0000 "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote: >Hopefully ECC memory protects against such exploits (at least >makes them a lot less vulnerable). ECC only makes it harder, it doesn't make it impossible. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?70815.1425933979>
