Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Dec 2025 11:37:05 +0100
From:      =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Sad Clouds <cryintothebluesky@gmail.com>
Cc:        Lexi Winter <ivy@freebsd.org>,  questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Trying to understand base system packages
Message-ID:  <86ecp1cnji.fsf@ltc.des.dev>
In-Reply-To: <20251211093606.eade25c5f5c65277120d2f6e@gmail.com> (Sad Clouds's message of "Thu, 11 Dec 2025 09:36:06 %2B0000")
References:  <20251205122830.cb88058f193987b47a95a77c@gmail.com> <20251205134510.6fae5caf@dorfdsl.de> <20251205143119.441cc1bd8722345d074a4480@gmail.com> <16e766b9-f442-4cef-a991-c940f6b8182a@gmail.com> <20251207081139.7e2f65b97b4c089ac0add431@gmail.com> <aTkvIvFJHLf4WxUa@amaryllis.le-fay.org> <aTm6mdWQ_nyv21El@rain.cave> <20251210203319.c248921c4e6aca9ba07458ae@gmail.com> <aToOxuaXNTa5LOOP@amaryllis.le-fay.org> <20251211093606.eade25c5f5c65277120d2f6e@gmail.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

Sad Clouds <cryintothebluesky@gmail.com> writes:
> There are many different software development processes and I guess each
> one has its pros and cons. I personally prefer the traditional software
> life cycle: requirements, design, implementation, testing, deployment.

This has been conclusively shown to be the worst possible way to develop
software and is therefore rarely used unless imposed by regulators or
underwriters.  And it has never been how F/OSS worked.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@FreeBSD.org


help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ecp1cnji.fsf>