Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 14:06:13 -0400 From: Greg Larkin <glarkin@FreeBSD.org> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Fix for CONFLICTS in emulators/linux_base ports Message-ID: <4A26BB95.7010002@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <22672149@h30.sp.ipt.ru> References: <4A242BF1.9050202@FreeBSD.org> <22672149@h30.sp.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Boris Samorodov wrote: > (Seems I've got this mail by private email and send an answer. > but for archieves I'll duplicate it here.) > > On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:28:49 -0400 Greg Larkin wrote: > >> Hi emulation team, > >> I'm working on a PR for graphics/linux-ac3d, and it required me to >> upgrade my linux_base-fc-4_14 package. I noticed that the newer >> linux_base-f ports don't include the correct package name in CONFLICTS >> for the older port. > > Thanks for taking care of it. I should have done it myself but > you know there are always other first-aid-things to do... :-( > >> I have included a patch for the ports that you maintain. Please review >> it when you have a moment and let me know what you think. > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~glarkin/diffs/bsam-linux_base.diff > > Some thoughts: > . I'm not sure if names without * can match anything (and > anyway if they do, ex. linux_base-fc will match linux_base-fc6, > the third diff); > . there are more linux_base ports now (including linux_base-f9, > linux_base-f10). They should be included into CONFLICTS and > their CONFLICTS should be considered either. > > Thanks once more! > > > WBR Hi Boris, I sent two emails with two separate patches, one directly to you and one to emulation@, since I wasn't sure who is a member of that alias. Sorry for the confusion on my end. Perhaps there is a very simple solution - do you think that all linux_base ports should have the following CONFLICTS line? CONFLICTS= linux_base-* That way, all Linux emulation layers will conflict with every other one, and we'll be covered for any future revisions. Let me know what you think, and I can commit the changes after generating a new patch for your review, if you like. Cheers, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFKJruV0sRouByUApARAgSxAKCAjd2C0/hp8bYkwd9PzlhQZz+5lgCgyGkV N/xt9rbW7CkIdQsct9ScY0Y= =GFGg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A26BB95.7010002>