Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 11:19:59 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcl -- what's going on here. Message-ID: <199606191719.LAA06390@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <24614.835204652@time.cdrom.com> References: <199606191527.JAA05879@rocky.sri.MT.net> <24614.835204652@time.cdrom.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Jordan K. Hubbard writes: > > Unless you can say that NO-ONE is willing to do the bmake-munging > > process for them, then this is a moot point. Apparently Peter already > > did, and I don't see a burning need for doing groff. > > By now you've alraedy read my other responses so I'll not belabor the > point. Suffice it to say that I don't see an abundance or scarcity of > `bmakers' as the issue so much as I do the difficulty involved. Again, my arguement is that the 'difficulty' is part and parcel of being in the tree. > I'd hoped we could get off that treadmill. If it weren't difficult > then you wouldn't even have to say: See above. It's a worthwhile difficulty, in the same manner as re-writing the VM system was worthwhile and adding laptop capability was worthwhile. The time spent isn't always fun, but the resultant product is. Natehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199606191719.LAA06390>