Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 09:15:56 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk Cc: yar@comp.chem.msu.su, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SET, CLR, ISSET in types.h for _KERNEL builds Message-ID: <20060705.091556.513891519.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <28872.1151526546@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20060628150227.R75801@fledge.watson.org> <28872.1151526546@critter.freebsd.dk>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In message: <28872.1151526546@critter.freebsd.dk>
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
: In message <20060628150227.R75801@fledge.watson.org>, "Andrew R. Reiter" writes
: :
: >
: >I apologize for top posting, but I lost the email that I think my
: >point/question pertains to.
: >
: >Part of this seems to be for compatibility / merging from drivers of other
: >OSes, no? If I am wrong, ignore me :-). If this is the case, would it be
: >better to create some common other area for things of this nature so that
: >it suffices to allow builds, but does not infect other areas of our own
: >code base?
:
: That's what I proposed too: #include <sys/netbsd_compat.h>
This is even lamer. It makes no sense to invent a stupid place for a
compatibility define. Might as well put the definition of NULL in
limits.h.
I'm killing this idea because people hate it.
Warner
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060705.091556.513891519.imp>