Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 Aug 2005 10:57:19 +0800
From:      "Mars G. Miro" <marsgmiro@gmail.com>
To:        Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject:   Re: ata devices on emulated amd64 on qemu
Message-ID:  <28edec3c05073119576445ec92@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <28edec3c050730045765b5262b@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <28edec3c0507290000415a350d@mail.gmail.com> <200507291540.52889.jkim@niksun.com> <200507291647.49230.jkim@niksun.com> <200507292022.38135.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <28edec3c050730045765b5262b@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/30/05, Mars G. Miro <marsgmiro@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/30/05, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > Okay.  I finally found a fix.  It was actually quite simple.  Newer=20
> > FreeBSD and Linux ATA drivers check whether the PCI ATA controller is=
=20
> > in legacy ATA mode (aka PATA mode).  The test failed and it was=20
> > treated like a SATA controller.  Of course, IRQ failed to map. ;-) =20
> > Try the attached patch.  Tested with FreeBSD/amd64 6.0-BETA1 guest on=
=20
> > FreeBSD/amd64 host.
> >=20
>=20
>=20
> You rock dude! This  patch fixes it. FreeBSD54/amd64 Guest on
> FreeBSD54/amd64 Host.
>=20
> Any thoughts of including this patch in the ports?
>=20
>=20


Oops. I noticed only now that this time, it's the emulated NE2000 NIC
that's not detected. This is for a FreeBSD/amd64 guest on
FreeBSD/amd64 Host.

Thanks.


> > Cheers,
> >=20
> > Jung-uk Kim
> >=20
> >=20
>=20
>=20


cheers
mars



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28edec3c05073119576445ec92>