Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2026 12:12:03 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@FreeBSD.org> To: "Jin Guojun[VFF]" <jguojun@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Hill <chris@monochrome.org>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pwd default behavior Message-ID: <86bji0byf0.fsf@ltc.des.dev> In-Reply-To: <293c194d-8eaa-4887-adf9-9f2c06006a6c@gmail.com> (Jin Guojun[VFF's message of "Fri, 6 Feb 2026 12:14:25 -0800") References: <877bsqe6m0.fsf@x1.laptops.machines> <86ms1lbzsd.fsf@ltc.des.dev> <6384c7bf-e66f-4baf-8b23-0e3b16e1a7f9@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.20.2602061316270.53186@tripel.monochrome.org> <293c194d-8eaa-4887-adf9-9f2c06006a6c@gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
"Jin Guojun[VFF]" <jguojun@gmail.com> writes: > The man page should be updated to reflect the different behaviors > between sh and csh. No. The pwd manual page is for /bin/pwd. There are separate manual pages for sh and csh, and yet another that lists shell builtins. Note also that csh does not have a pwd builtin. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@FreeBSD.orghome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86bji0byf0.fsf>