Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2019 15:49:21 -0500 From: Clay Daniels <clay.daniels.jr@gmail.com> To: Miranda van den Breukelingen <mms.vanbreukelingen@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: GhostBSD and FreeBSD-sources Message-ID: <CAGLDxTUKo3P0T5maTH3nLeO13fr_UeGTG7xZL-u04DL7_KZyPw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <33dd6159-89be-ecc9-175f-4d7764e2af82@gmail.com> References: <33dd6159-89be-ecc9-175f-4d7764e2af82@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
GhostBSD is downstream to FreeBSD. Take a look at DistroWatch: https://distrowatch.com/search.php?ostype=BSD&category=All&origin=All&basedon=FreeBSD¬basedon=None&desktop=All&architecture=All&package=All&rolling=All&isosize=All&netinstall=All&language=All&defaultinit=All&status=Active#simple On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 3:28 PM Miranda van den Breukelingen < mms.vanbreukelingen@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear specialists, > > I've been the one who didn't let Xorg -configure happen successfully on > current. I tried a lot on freeBSD/TrueOS based distributions and beeing > kept at GhostBSD. There the sfcb-driver works and with mode=3 I can get > full 1920x1080 now - but Xrender means no desktop cube, lines and less > openGL making great lines into the desktop. OpenGL 20/31 does for 20 > mins, then kwin_x11 let shine all windows with black entry, so you have > to restart. Other WM produce didn't work. So, after Alt+F2 'kstart5 > plasmashell' desktop is fully compatible - so never give up on X > matters, AMDGPU and radeon don't work as a firmware bug and coulnd't be > initialized - not on FreeBSD nor on GhostBSD or whatever. But > modesetting is a way to have at least base grafical function. > > Now to the question: the latest development release of GhostBSD is 12.1; > I svn up'd the freeBSD sources as the kernel boots quickly and is 100% > freeBSD IMO - until openRC starts. We have a networkmgr, btw? Wow! And > the Software Center grafically without the Arch octopi-clone? Wow again! > Let's see what Solaris means after 2010 to me and there's a > hackintosh-project, that runs clearly from virtualization but has > physical boot-up-problems. But to BSD: the sources '/base/head' should > be compatible but is there a+++meta package with kernel build tools and > a makeworld that is bootable? What do I need? clang, gcc, cc, sed and > what else? There'd to be a meta-package for kernel development! > > Please don't fool me because of a non-distro question but it matters > freeBSD on the base, too. And if I just can improve the running 12.1. > to CURRENT GENERIC it would be a superb effect for many of us! Thx for > answers in advance. > > > Miranda > > PS: my ubt0 makes progress, although not beeing able to connect; but at > least the whole stuff doesn't kill itself anymore. > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGLDxTUKo3P0T5maTH3nLeO13fr_UeGTG7xZL-u04DL7_KZyPw>