Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 09:19:58 +0930 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@freebsd.org>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern subr_log.c subr_rlist.c tty_pty.c tty_snoop.c tty_tty.c uipc_domain.c vfs_subr.c src/sys/net bpf.c netisr.h route.c src/sys/netinet igmp.c in_proto.c ip_fw.h tcp_subr.c src/sys/sys buf.h exe Message-ID: <199709162350.JAA00511@word.smith.net.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 16 Sep 1997 10:46:42 MST." <341EC602.167EB0E7@whistle.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> Bruce Evans wrote: > I think this has been discussed before.. > but... > WHY!!!!! I think Bruce's line was "be consistent with whatever file you're in". > in the example given I think the original made more sense, > and didn't we vote to stop adding more of the stupid __P() stuff? IMHO, we should ANSIfy wherever we go. Others have different opinions. The "be consistent" line was the consensus that came out of the last war on this topic. mikehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709162350.JAA00511>