Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 4 May 1998 04:42:44 +0200
From:      Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
To:        John Kelly <jak@cetlink.net>
Cc:        chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/www/ijb - Imported sources
Message-ID:  <19980504044244.39282@follo.net>
In-Reply-To: <354e28ff.227031838@mail.cetlink.net>; from John Kelly on Mon, May 04, 1998 at 02:35:44AM %2B0000
References:  <19980503230438.48318@follo.net> <Pine.BSF.3.96.980503205621.20104E-100000@sasami.jurai.net> <19980504032939.07389@follo.net> <354d2457.225839725@mail.cetlink.net> <19980504042649.61453@follo.net> <354e28ff.227031838@mail.cetlink.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 02:35:44AM +0000, John Kelly wrote:
> On Mon, 4 May 1998 04:26:49 +0200, Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
> wrote:
> 
>>> I don't have to view pornography.  I can "filter" it to pervent it
>>> from coming into my home.  Same principle applies for any other
>>> information content coming into my home.  I can filter it any way I
>>> want.  In my home, my right to privacy supersedes any advertisers'
>>> rights.
>>
>> Besides, you're not able to type coherently.  There is no privacy involved.
> 
> On the contrary, there is.

What about the part before 'besides'?  What about _any_ underpinning of your
claim?

I can agree that there is an issue of being allowed to control what is going
on in your own home (which you're not, in any country that I know of). 
However, that is _not_ the same as privacy.  Please come with some form of
argument.

> You're losing the debate so now you resort to insults.

You seem to be unable to answer any arguments, and thus go for language. 
So, for the understanding-impaired, I'll rephrase: What makes you claim that
there is privacy involved?  If you can't come up with something that
resemble a coherent argument, I will still consider you to be unable to type
coherently.  Random sentences which follow the general rules of english
isn't good enough - there must be coherency at the semantic level, too.

Eivind.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980504044244.39282>